Parliamentary versus Presidential governments

Evident from Cheibub, Elkins, and Ginsburg article, the parliamentary systems of rules are better and preferred compared to presidential system. Such systems are preferred because of their stability, efficiency, and accountability. They are also less exposure to corruption. Depending on the quality of the leaders, parliamentary structures ensure that decisions are not made secretly (Cheibub, Elkins,  & Ginsburg, 2013). Parliamentary systems of leadership are not universally adopted because they accord absolute and unlimited powers to parliaments to act as a central institution in the state. Although not universally adopted, most scholars have emphasized the diversity of parliamentary governments and proved how countries with such systems work better compared to those with presidential arrangements. Parliamentary systems are said to work better especially in small-sized countries. This system puts less strains on governmental officials simply because voters place some discipline measures on regulatory procedures, and the economy is open as well. When it comes to large and diverse countries, the presidential system is preferred because voters opinion poses a major constraint on the government (Cheibub, Elkins, & Ginsburg, 2013).

You will get assigned a top 10 writer in our team. Additionally, for this your first order, one page will be written for you for free.  . .