Stop Being Stressed, Let Our Experienced Writers Handle it for you

  • 100% Original Papers Guaranteed
  • Original and creative work
  • Timely delivery guaranteed
  • 100% confidentiality guarantee

Archive for the ‘Essay writing Guide’ Category

How to Write an Article Review: Step-by-step Guide

An article review is a type of writing that involves assessing and giving a summary of an article. It requires in-depth analysis and evaluation of the theme and the supporting arguments. It is a constructive and critical review of literature through summary, analysis, comparison, and classification. The critical review aspect is concerned with a detailed review of an article or a book while the literature review is concerned with the summary, comparison, and classification of many pieces of literature. It is an important piece of professional writing mainly used in academia to evaluate the work of others in order to improve their skills. The writing is synonymous among professionals and experts because it requires a good understanding of the topic in order to provide an outstanding critic, summary, and analysis.

What is the purpose of an article review?

  1. An article review is mainly used in academia to criticize one’s article or literature to improve on their writing such as by increasing statement clarity.
  2. An article review is also important to provide a different perspective from that of the author to eliminate biasnes
  3. It is also an important tool for encouraging better writing because it encourages the author to improve on their work.

Steps for preparing for an article review

Step 1: understand the purpose of your writing

Before embarking on the writing process of your review, you need to understand the key objective of the review. While many review works involve analysis and summary, the type of review differs. For a student, this is where you need to go through the assignment instructions to understand what’s required regarding the review work. To put this into perspective, here are different types of review:

Journal review: Journal article review is mainly concerned with the evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of a publication.

Research article review: Research article review is mainly concerned with the evaluation of research methods used 

Science article review: This is a general scientific review work focusing mainly on analysis of scientific publication.

You need to understand that your review is not new research but rather a response to the author in form of an evaluation or a summary 

Step 2: Create an organization for your article review

The organization determines the process through which you will review the article. The components include:

Summary of the article

You should start by defining a summary of the article by highlighting key points, authors’ claims, and general information provided. This will help in the classification of the points in the subsequent stages of the review.

Identify positive points

Having identified the key points, you should start your analysis by good insights and points in relation to the topic. Remember that analysis involves identifying and recognizing both the negative and positive aspects of the writing.  

Analyze for gaps or inconsistencies in the article

This is where you go deeper with the analysis to identify possible gaps in the author’s arguments. It is also where you evaluate the research methods and results for any inconsistencies. For example, if you are performing a research review this is where to assess the eligibility and accuracy of the methods used by the author. Furthermore, by digging deeper into the work, you can identify some contradictions the author made in linking the research with the supporting literature. For research review, this is also the stage where you look for unanswered questions. 

write my article review

Step 3: Have a quick view of the article

Having designed a plan for your review, take time to have a quick look at the article just to have an idea of what it is about. This is the first reading of the article that involves having a glimpse of the main sections of the article including the abstract, introduction, and conclusion. To have an initial grasp, go through the first sentences of the paragraphs to understand the author’s perspective and the purpose for writing. The reason for taking a glimpse of the paper is to prepare you for the full reading. It helps you identify the key points that would be of interest to you during the full reading. Moreover, it helps you to gauge your knowledge of the topic which will be key in providing constructive evaluation.

Step 4: Careful reading of the full article

Armed with a brief knowledge of the topic, now take time to go through the article several times. Remember that you are reading to give a review therefore make sure that you highlight the main points particularly those that will be of interest in your evaluation. You can jot down the key points in note form as a point of reference during your review. At this stage, you should start identifying different arguments, assertions and proofs and draw connections. For example, you should be able to draw connections between the literature and the research results. This will be key in evaluating the author’s ability to connect the previous knowledge with the current work. 

This stage of reading also involves comparing the author’s arguments with your knowledge on the topic. Determine whether your knowledge supports the author’s arguments and how the article is similar to other articles on the same topic. Comparing the author’s arguments with your knowledge will be vital in creating room for further research on the evidence supporting the two. Remember that you might not be having all the knowledge to deliver an effective review and would need to provide references to other works to prove your arguments. 

Step 5: Rewrite the article in your own words

The is preliminary writing which involves putting down what you have read in writing to guide the final writing process. The reason for writing it in your own words is to ensure that you understood the topic and have considerable control over it. Put down the main points of the article including the author’s arguments and research results. Remember that this writing is only for your use and may not be as thorough or organized as the final writing. However, it needs to be clear enough to guide your final writing. You should also ensure that it captures the styles and formats employed by the author. You can go through the article, again and again, to ensure that you capture all the key points.

Step 6: Create an outline for your evaluation

This is the last stage of preparing for the actual writing where you create a guideline for the review process. Having read and understood the article you need to come up with a review guideline or approach. Identify and collect the strong points of the author and the drawbacks. Identify where the author failed in presenting his arguments and how well and accurate some arguments are. 

The steps of writing an article review

In the previous stages, you have read the article, made a short overview, and created an evaluation outline. The following steps will now guide you through the processes of writing the actual review based on the preparation made earlier.

Step 1: Create the title for your review

Before beginning your writing, you need to come up with a title that best matches the objective of your review. This being a review work, your title is likely to be an adoption of the article you are reviewing. Some authors prefer adding the phrase “A review of” followed by the title of the article. However, the best approach is to follow the review objective.

Step 2: Cite the article

The second step is to cite the article you are reviewing just below your title. You should ensure that you follow the right citation format of your review e.g. MLA, APA, or Harvard.

Step 3: identify the article

This is the step where you identify the article on review by including details such as the title of the article, the Author, title of the journal, and year of publication.

Step 4: Introduce your review

Introduce your article review by starting with an identification sentence followed by the key topic of the article. Here are tips for writing a good introduction:

  1. It should take 10% of the entire review
  2. It should be written in third person as the rest of the review.
  3. It should include a thesis that points out the drawbacks of the article

Step 5: write the summary

This is where you cover the main points and findings of the article. Use the preliminary writing created earlier to guide you in this stage. You should consider the following when writing the summary:

  1. Write the authors arguments in your own words
  2. Focus mainly on the key points and arguments in every section of the article
  3. Re-read your summary to make sure that everything is accurate

Step 6: write your critique

This is the stage where you give your opinion on how the author tackled the topic. It should include the following:

  1. Give your opinion on the usefulness of the explanation of the topic by the author
  2. Describe how the author arguments contributed to understanding the topic
  3. Explain how the article contributes to the field
  4. State whether you agree with the author and explain why or why not
  5. Identify any biases in the author’s arguments
  6. State the right audience for the article

Step 7: conclude your article review

As you conclude your review, give a summary of the main points, and the significance of the article. You can also give a closing statement by indicating the relevance of the article and its implications. 

Sample Article Review

Dog Attachment and Perceived Social Support in Overweight/Obese and Healthy Weight Children – Deborah E. Linder, Jennifer M. Sacheck, Farzad Noubary, Miriam E. Nelson, & Lisa M. Freeman


            The main aim of the research was to establish the relationship between childhood obesity and dog attachment. Further, the primary objective was to verify how weight gain is related to social support from family and friends. Notably, a similar investigation had been conducted with adult participants, but there was a study gap in regards to children (Linder et al., 2017). Due to an increasing rate of obesity in kids in the current world, it was essential that control mechanisms get established. However, the only way to provide a solution was to find the cause. On that note, the study that took four months was conducted in the living laboratory in a Boston museum from April to August 2015. The researchers had an informed hypothesis based on a similar exploration that was done with adults, where overweight grownups had more attachment to their pets (Linder et al., 2017). On that effect, participating children were selected based on age, and those between 8-13 years old were the ones allowed to be a part of the research. In addition, only kids who visited the museum under the care of either parents or guardians were accepted for the study. Statistically, the investigation managed to sample only 43 children who filled surveys that were later analyzed. Therefore, the finding of the research will inform future studies on this topic regarding the improvements that are to be made.   

Overview of the Article

            The basis of the research was to develop sustainable and effective interventions for treating children with obesity. Markedly, the study was based on the fact that overweight is a global challenge and a priority. According to Linder et al. (2017), obesity is a worldwide health issue that inflicts people who take high-energy food, and it results in fat accumulation. Consequently, it occurs due to weight gain that predisposes individuals to health problems such as diabetes, stroke, heart diseases, and cancers among others. The principal aim of the research was to examine the child-pet relationship to unravel proper obesity treatments among kids. Overall, the findings of the study showed that overweight minors with either 85 or more body mass index (BMI) had higher attachment scores to their pets, and they were registered to be less mean in the perceived social support (PSS). The PSS was determined from the parents and friends of both obese and healthy children. Resultantly, the overweight children had greater affection for their dogs and lowered social support. The outcome provides the insight of how pets can get used for unhealthy kids. 

Evaluating the Methodology

            The methodology section outlines how data was collected and analyzed. Markedly, Kuiper et al. (2017) noted that studies often choose the methods based on the nature of the research and the ideas borrowed from previous works. The authors added that three main investigation approaches are informed by different exploration philosophies known as the quantitative, qualitative, or mixed method. Moreover, Yoon (2017) stated that researcher should always provide a theoretical justification of the method used. Notably, the study was non-experimental and followed a quantitative model of research that involved the collection of numerical data and application of statistical analysis. As mentioned, a cross-sectional design got employed, thus allowing collection of data at a particular time (Olive, 2014). In addition, the research performed by Linder et al. (2017) was practical and related to a serious health problem in the current society. Despite the fact that the paper has no specified section called “Literature Review,” the researchers developed the problem having assessed the other works in the field. In fact, the ideas, concepts, theories, variables, and the methodology were borrowed from the previous studies. Notably, the research is consistent with the contemporary studies on health issues. On that note, the paper needs improvements on the literature review.

            A sample size of 43 participants was adopted although it was not selected randomly. Clear exclusion criteria were developed to omit children without either pets or parents/legal guardians. Besides, only kids between the ages of 8 and 13 years old were included. Notably, a survey was employed as the instrument of data collection after adhering to the ethical and professional rules of information gathering. Precisely, participation was voluntary, and consents were gathered from the children and parents. Other principles applied included privacy, confidentiality, and authorization from a given research body. The data was analyzed using statistical tools such as t-test and chi-square to present quantitative results. Moreover, there were instances of bias in the selection of the respondents, primarily by excluding children without dogs and those below eight years old or over 13 years old. The sample size (43) was also small given the growing number of obese teens in the area of the study. Moreover, most participants were female because the sample was not correctly selected. As a result, the composition was not even a scenario that could cause bias in the results. Overall, the methodology was well-organized and integrated all the required components.

Objectives and Results

            As aforementioned, the primary objective of the study was to examine the dog-children relationship to understand how pets can be used for treatment of kids with obesity. The three main variables include dog-children connection, perceived social support, and attachment level. Despite the fact that the researchers did not delineate either the specific objectives or the research questions, it is clear that the affection influences children’s motivation, focus, emotional stability, mental health, enjoyment, and physical activities among others. In addition, the social support concerned the relationship of the included kids with either their parents or friends. They were voluntary sampled to take their children to the museum and answer certain questions about the kids. Empirically, the study aimed to prove the hypothesis that either dogs or other pets may offer social support to the obese children and, thus, should be included in the intervention mechanisms.

My Evaluation and Opinion

            From the results, it was perceived that the overweight teens often have a close relationship with their pets, and it gives them emotional, mental, and physical support. The explanation is that the obese children often lack strong attachment to their parents, legal guardians, or friends. Markedly, the results of the study showed that being overweight establishes a stronger connection between children and their pets, while it lowers the perceived social support. However, I am of the opinion that the outcome should not be applied directly due to some undefined parameters such as the number of dogs attached to the child and their ages. It can be concluded that dogs can get used as an essential part of health intervention for the overweight kids.

            Markedly, I found the article to be straightforward and clear, and the characteristics make it applicable and practical in real life context. However, it needs improvements on developing detailed theoretical underpinnings to the concepts and hypotheses identified. While performing future researches, I recommend that more variables should be considered, and they include the number of pets in a household and their ages. Besides, the years of the participants should be expanded from the current 8-13 to 5-17 because obesity is becoming a problem in kids with a young age and extends to the older teens. Consequently, further researches should get conducted on how either dogs or other pets can be included to support other health problems.


            Obesity and overweight are trending global problems, especially among children. The increase in high-energy food, unhealthy behaviors, and inactivity cause more harm to the body of kids. The co-morbidities, where obesity is related to several chronic and non-communicable diseases, are also compounding the challenge and priority of human health. The victims are at higher risks of contracting chronic and non-communicable diseases such as heart problems, stroke, diabetes, and cancers. Evidently, the article is consistent with other studies. Markedly, the main findings of the research showed that obese teens have a stronger attachment to their pets and lower perceived social support. On that note, dogs can be used as an intervention to child obesity. The research used quantitative data collection and analysis, but little was done on reviewing previous studies. Besides, the results experienced some bias due to poor sampling and sample size. On this note, future researches need to improve the technique of selecting the participants to facilitate the applicability of the results in solving childhood obesity problem.


Kuiper, C., Smit, J., De Wachter, L., & Elen, J. (2017). Scaffolding tertiary students’ writing in a genre-based writing intervention. Journal of Writing Research, 9(1), 27-59.

Linder, D., Sacheck, J., Noubary, F., Nelson, M., & Freeman, L. (2017). Dog attachment and perceived social support in overweight/obese and healthy weight children. Preventive Medicine Reports, 6, 352-354.

Olive, T. (2014). Toward a parallel and cascading model of the writing system: A review of research on writing processes coordination. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 173-194.

Yoon, E. (2017). Book review: Teaching and researching writing. Journal of Writing Research, 8(3), 531-533.

Order your paper today and have it written by a professional. You will get assigned a top 10 writer on our team. Additionally, for this your first order, one page will be written for you for free. We guarantee timely delivery and a first class written paper that fully follow your instructions. In case you experience any difficulty placing the order, don’t hesitate to contact our 24/7 support team via the Live Chat at the bottom right of the page. Moreover, use the code below to get more discount.
Get a 15 % discount on an order above $ 120
Use the following coupon code :

How to Write a compelling Research Paper with a Sample

Research paper writing is an essential part of your academics, especially for college students. On one hand, it can be a very daunting task due to anxiety and lack of preparedness. On the other hand, writing research can be the most rewarding experience with adequate preparedness. Writing a compelling research paper often requires that the student determines a broad research area based on the course. You will then need to select a focus topic through background reading and identify a clear research question. Consequently, the student should search primary and secondary sources to find answers for the research question and present the arguments in a thoughtful and clear manner. This article guides you through writing a compelling research paper to earn you good grades. We walk you through the steps you need to write a strong paper together with a sample.

Step 1:  understand the assignment

This stage is often overlooked but is one of the most important aspects of writing a strong research paper. Understanding the research paper requirements provided by the instructor is vital to developing an accurate guideline for your writing. You need to carefully go through the instructor’s assignment, prompts, and grading rubric to understand what is required of you. In particular, you need to understand the topic area you are required to write about and ask for clarifications from the instructor if need be. Take time to go through the grading rubric because it highlights the key points or areas to be covered in your research paper. While there is a standard format for writing a research paper, some instructors may give specific formatting guidelines for the paper. Therefore, as a student, you need to pay attention to the requirements before starting your writing.

Step 2: Choose an appropriate topic

In most cases, instructors assign students research paper topics. However, in some cases, the students have the freedom of choosing their preferred topic provided it is within the course coverage. The best approach to picking a research topic is to choose one that interests you or you are passionate about. This way you will be compelled to do thorough research and learn more about it. Moreover, you are likely to enjoy writing about a topic you are passionate about more than others.

In some cases, the preferred topic may not fit in the assignment guidelines. In such a case, consult with the instructor to guide you through the topic selection to ensure that your research paper writing remains within the requirements. At the end of the day, you should understand that this is academic writing that must be delivered in a specific format and style. Another approach to selecting a research paper topic is picking a topic you find challenging that can inspire you to research further and learn new things. One of the objectives of a research paper in academics is to test your research capability. That is the ability to find new information and organize and present it in a thoughtful manner for easy understanding by the reader. Therefore, by seeking more information about a topic you become an expert at it at the end of your writing. However, selecting a challenging topic should not be equated to choosing a technical one. Try to avoid technical topics especially if they are outside your discipline because they may require technical knowledge which may take longer to acquire.

how to write research paper

Step 3: Research on the topic

This is another important stage in research paper writing which involves gathering and organizing resources around your topic. Research is key to understanding your subject, creating ideas around the topic, and developing a strong thesis. Some of the tips to consider when performing your research include:

First, skim through the resources and identify key points. Research is one of the most time-consuming stages and reading every resource related to your topic may consume even more time. Therefore, it is advisable to skim through quickly as you note down the key arguments

Another tip is to ensure that you focus only on reliable resources. You can read all the relevant resources online such as Wikipedia to enrich yourself about the topic. However, you need reliable sources to write a strong research paper. Your research paper should only utilize well-sourced academic resources like journals. It is advisable that you cite the original source of the information rather than the secondary source. You can find valuable information and arguments in other sources like Wikipedia but it is important that you reference reliable sources from academic databases supporting the arguments. Some of the sources for research include books and periodicals, google scholar, government publications, newspapers and online encyclopedias, and databases. Always compare sources to ensure that an argument or idea is supported by more than two sources to ensure the credibility of the information.

Step 4: Develop a thesis for your research paper

A thesis statement is a short statement that states your objective as a writer such as what you are trying to prove or explain. It seeks to answer the research question and what you intend to talk about in the paper. Therefore, it needs to be precise and reflective of your type of writing. It should determine if your paper is argumentative, persuasive, expository, or analytical. It is important that you keep your thesis statement debatable in a manner that provokes argument and supporting evidence. Here is an example of a thesis statement:

The primary objective of the paper is to explore the political system of the Nordic region which has successfully run a political system that established an effective balance between socialism and capitalism.

Step 5: Develop an outline

An outline is a structure of the paper that determines how you organize the ideas obtained from the research. It is through an excellent outline that you as the writer can make sense of your paper during the revision before submitting it to the instructor. The outline also acts as a guide through your paper to help the reader understand it better. The main points you will need to support your thesis statement form the sub-headings in your paper under which you will organize your ideas.  In some cases, the professor may ask you for an outline before you start your writing. This is to ensure that your paper meets the requirements and remains within the subject.

A typical research paper consists of the following sections: title page, abstract, introduction, methodology, findings, discussion, and conclusion. However, this may not always be the case because sometimes the instructor may ask you to write a short research paper. In such a case, you may only have three sections in the paper: introduction, body, and conclusion.

Creating a good outline also requires you to think critically about the objective of the research paper and come up with a structure that organizes those thoughts effectively. Between the introduction and the conclusion sections of your paper should be an organized flow of ideas around your subject. It is also advisable that you remain strictly within the boundaries of the outline. You should avoid ideas that are not directly related to the thesis statement and don’t fit within the outline.

  1. Here are the questions to consider when creating an outline:
  2. What is the topic of the paper?
  3. Why is the topic significant?
  4. What are the relevant background materials?
  5. What is the thesis statement?
  6. What structure will best support the purpose of the paper?

Step 6: Write the paper

This is the stage that determines how well you performed in the previous steps. Having gathered ideas from various sources it is time to organize them thoughtfully to come up with a great academic research paper. One important factor to consider when writing your research paper is to focus on presenting your ideas in a clear, precise, and interesting manner without trying to make them perfect. Perfection comes at a later stage.

Your writing is a representation of your thoughts supported by the information obtained from the research. Therefore, you should not write directly from the research but generate thoughts from your memory. However, you can occasionally refer back to your research for statistics or specific quotes. Moreover, writing from your memory as opposed to copying from the research helps avoid plagiarism which is the uncredited use of one’s ideas. Plagiarism is taken seriously in academics and considered a serious offense that may lead to penalization from your instructor. This is why it is advisable to write an original paper and cite your sources whenever you borrow a piece of information from someone’s work. Notably, you are allowed to quote directly from your sources using quotation marks and cite the sources. Alternatively, you can paraphrase someone’s words and give credit.

The following are the main parts of your research paper:

Introduction section of the research paper

As the opening statement of your research paper, the introduction should be strong, interesting and provocative enough to grab the attention of the reader. This is where you give a statement about the purpose of the paper and your approach to the topic. Your introduction should consist of:

Setting the context: where you provide a general description of the topic to help the reader have an idea of the topic

Justify the main idea: where you provide the importance of the topic and why it is worth discussing

The thesis: where you state your position in regards to the topic such as whether you support or oppose it.

Writing the body section of a research paper

The body of your research consists of the sub-headings identified earlier in the paper outline. Based on the subheadings, you should generate ideas to form paragraphs covering specific points around the topic and focus on the thesis statement. Therefore, your body section should adhere to the outline created earlier. The paragraphs should consist of strong topic sentences supported by arguments and relevant evidence.

Writing the conclusion

This section summarizes the paper and justifies how it supports the thesis. You can start this section by restating the thesis statement followed by a summary of the points and an explanation of how the ideas support the thesis. You can also call for further research if your research was inconclusive.

Step 7: Proofread and edit your paper

Having presented your ideas about the topic now is the time to make your paper perfect and academically presentable by proofreading. This is the stage where you ensure that your paper is well structured and organized with logical flow of ideas. Check the paragraphs to ensure that they are well-structured and ideas clearly stated with supporting evidence. Consequently, you should check your paper for grammar and spelling mistakes. Some of the things to consider include:

  1. Proper citation of sources
  2. Credibility of evidence
  3. Plagiarism
  4. Clarity of the thesis statement
  5. Logical transition
  6. Repetition of words or ideas

Sample Research Paper

Gun Law

The second amendment expressly grants every United States’ citizen rights to bear arms and makes adequate efforts to control the usage of the weapons. However, this law has provided a rich avenue for one of the most hotly debated issues within the land, with the nation being virtually divided on the best course of action. The debate gets rooted on the opinion differences between the country’s most popular parties, the Democrats and the Republicans (Newport and Dugan). Notably, Coates gave accounts of the struggles of black Americans who had to work twice as hard and were continuously targeted by the police with high chances of being killed (9). As the discussions take sides between gun control and gun rights, it is imperative that a clear firearm law should get enacted. Thus, owing to the widening margin between the Democrats and Republicans with regards to gun laws, stringent firearm control policies should be implemented to reduce crime rates as well as racial profiling.

            The availability of guns to the majority of citizens increases the instances of violent crimes perpetrated within the country. With an almost unanimous agreement between the Democrats and the Republicans on background checks before the issuance of weapons, regulation of firearm laws would ensure that mature and well-adjusted individuals get to be the ones to carry guns (Newport and Dugan). Notably, this would ensure that the majority of citizens are motivated to showcase positive values and increase their chances of possessing weapons. In addition, punitive litigation procedures would be implemented against offenders found guilty of misusing their guns and those found owning them illegally. On the same note, it will be essential that all individuals in need of firearms are properly vetted and take through some training on how to use the weapons before they get cleared to possess them. These measures to control gun laws would reduce the rates of crimes as well as the instances of racial profiling of minority races such as the blacks. Hence, there will be reduced cases of gun misuse as well as decreased rates of crime.

            Controlled access to weapons places a limit on each citizen’s right to bear arms in line with the second amendment, which gives Americans freedom to possess weapons. Although the claim that the presence of guns increases the chances of violent crimes cannot be substantiated beyond all reasonable doubts, firearms increase violence in communities. However, each citizen is expected to be mature and care for the others to ensure a free and fair economy, where all can chase after the American dream safely (Napolitano). In recent instances, racial provocations have been witnessed, and both blacks and whites have caused deaths and injuries against each other using firearms. On this note, regulating the right to guns will not only reduce violence and crime, but will foster economic empowerment and peaceful coexistence of Americans. Therefore, the rights of citizens to bear firearms should be maintained, but only to the qualified and mature individuals.

Gun laws continue to be one of the most passionately discussed legislations within the country. The Republicans favor the enforcement of the second amendment, the rights of each citizen, while the Democrats support peace within communities by regulating the gun laws within the states. Markedly, these conflicting views have increased the sharpness of differences among the country’s supporters. Consequently, gun control should be favored as compared to the application of firearm rights because it will reduce instances of violent guns crimes and ensure the possibilities of safe behavior in handling weapons.

Works Cited

1. Coates, Ta-Nehisi. Between the World and Me. New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2015.

2. Napolitano, Andrew P. “Judge Napolitano: Why I Will Always Defend the Second Amendment and the Right to Self-Defense.” Fox News, 16 June 2016,

3. Newport, Frank, and Andrew Dugan. “Partisan Differences Growing on a Number of Issues.” Gallup News, 3 Aug. 2017, g_source=POLITICS&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles

Order your paper today and have it written by a professional. You will get assigned a top 10 writer on our team. Additionally, for this your first order, one page will be written for you for free. We guarantee timely delivery and a first class written paper that fully follow your instructions. In case you experience any difficulty placing the order, don’t hesitate to contact our 24/7 support team via the Live Chat at the bottom right of the page. Moreover, use the code below to get more discount.
Get a 15 % discount on an order above $ 120
Use the following coupon code :